theAvoidact.com
Updated with Chapter Amendments

The AVOID Act: annotated text of CPLR § 1007

The full text of CPLR § 1007 as amended by the AVOID Act and subsequent chapter amendments, with plain-English annotations for each subdivision. Effective April 18, 2026.

Unverified

The statutory text on this page is a plausible reconstruction based on publicly available descriptions of the AVOID Act and CPLR § 1007. It has not been verified against the official New York session law or McKinney's Consolidated Laws. A licensed New York attorney must review and correct all text before reliance.

SUBDIVISION (A)

General authority to implead

After the service of his answer, a defendant may proceed against a person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to him for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim against him, by filing a summons and third-party complaint with the clerk of the court, subject to the time limitations set forth in this section. The defendant shall forthwith serve a copy of the third-party complaint upon all other parties to the action.
What this means
This subdivision preserves the general right to implead but now makes that right expressly subject to the time limitations set forth in this section. The phrase "subject to the time limitations set forth in this section" was added by the AVOID Act to make clear that the deadlines in subdivisions (b) through (e) govern all third-party filings.
SUBDIVISION (B)

Time limitation: unified 90-day deadline

A defendant shall not file a third-party summons and complaint more than ninety days after serving its answer without an order of the court.
What this means
This is the core rule of the AVOID Act. A defendant has 90 calendar days from serving its answer to file any third-party summons and complaint as of right. There is no distinction between contractual and non-contractual claims. After 90 days, a court order is required. The chapter amendments replaced the original bill’s tiered structure with this single unified deadline.
SUBDIVISION (C)

Note of issue: good-cause exception

No third-party summons and complaint may be filed after the filing of a note of issue unless upon good cause shown or in the interest of justice.
What this means
Once the note of issue is filed, filing a third-party complaint is not automatically barred but requires a showing of good cause or that the interest of justice requires it. This is a significant gatekeeping rule: defendants who miss the 90-day window and have not yet filed a note of issue may still seek a court order, but post-note-of-issue filings face the higher good-cause standard.
SUBDIVISION (D)

Remedy for violations

An action filed in violation of this section shall be severed or dismissed without prejudice.
What this means
This subdivision specifies the remedy for a filing that violates the time limitations in subdivisions (b), (c), and (e): the action shall be severed or dismissed without prejudice. Severance separates the third-party action from the main case; per § 1007(f), a severed action may not thereafter be consolidated with the main action, so severance functions as a near-permanent procedural separation. Dismissal without prejudice leaves the underlying claim intact to be refiled as an independent action, subject to the applicable statute of limitations.
SUBDIVISION (E)

Employer exception: 90-day window

Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (b) of this section, a defendant or third-party defendant may file a third-party summons and complaint against an employer of the plaintiff within ninety days of the later of: (1) the date the identity of the employer becomes known, or (2) the date the defendant knows or should know the plaintiff sustained a grave injury as defined in Workers’ Compensation Law § 11.
What this means
The employer exception preserves access to the WCL § 11 grave injury claim, which is critical in Labor Law construction cases. The 90-day window is measured from whichever triggering event occurs later: learning of the employer’s identity, or learning of the grave injury. Because both facts are often confirmed through investigation and medical records, this provision requires active case monitoring from the date of service. Note that the window is 90 days, identical to the standard deadline in subdivision (b).
SUBDIVISION (F)

Consolidation ban

A third-party action that has been severed from the main action pursuant to this section or pursuant to CPLR section 603 may not thereafter be consolidated with the main action.
What this means
Once severed, always severed. This provision closes a potential loophole by which a defendant might delay filing, accept severance, and then seek reconsolidation to avoid the practical impact of the deadline. The consolidation ban is permanent and unconditional.

Stay informed

Get notified when courts issue AVOID Act rulings

The annotated text is a living document. Updates go to subscribers first.

By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from TheAvoidAct.com. Unsubscribe any time.