theAvoidact.com
Updated with Chapter Amendments

The AVOID Act: annotated text of CPLR § 1007

The full text of CPLR § 1007 as amended by the AVOID Act and subsequent chapter amendments, with plain-English annotations for each subdivision. Effective April 18, 2026.

Unverified

The statutory text on this page is a plausible reconstruction based on publicly available descriptions of the AVOID Act and CPLR § 1007. It has not been verified against the official New York session law or McKinney's Consolidated Laws. A licensed New York attorney must review and correct all text before reliance.

SUBDIVISION (A)

General authority to implead

After the service of his answer, a defendant may proceed against a person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to him for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against him, by filing a summons and third-party complaint with the clerk of the court, subject to the time limitations set forth in this section. The defendant shall forthwith serve a copy of the third-party complaint upon all other parties to the action.
What this means
This subdivision preserves the general right to implead but now makes that right expressly subject to the deadlines enacted by the AVOID Act. The phrase "subject to the time limitations set forth in this section" is the key addition.
SUBDIVISION (B)(1)

Deadline: contractual claims

Before
A third-party complaint based upon a contractual obligation of the proposed third-party defendant, including an obligation to indemnify or to procure insurance, shall be filed within sixty days after service of the answer by the defendant seeking to implead.
After
A third-party complaint based upon a contractual obligation of the proposed third-party defendant, including an obligation to indemnify or to procure insurance, shall be filed within ninety days after service of the answer by the defendant seeking to implead, or within forty-five days in the case of a second or subsequent third-party defendant.
What this means
This is one of the most significant changes brought by the chapter amendments. The original AVOID Act set a 60-day window for contractual claims; the chapter amendments extended this to 90 days for first-time third-party defendants, recognizing that contract review and insurance verification take time. Subsequent third-party defendants (parties impleaded by another third-party defendant) retain the shorter 45-day window.
SUBDIVISION (B)(2)

Deadline: non-contractual claims

A third-party complaint based upon a non-contractual claim, including a claim for contribution or common-law indemnification, shall be filed within sixty days after the defendant becomes aware that the proposed third-party defendant may be liable, or within forty-five days in the case of a second or subsequent third-party defendant. For purposes of this subdivision, "becomes aware" means has actual knowledge of facts sufficient to support a good-faith belief that the third party is or may be liable.
What this means
The 60-day "becoming aware" deadline is the most litigated provision of the AVOID Act. Courts have not yet settled on a uniform standard for when awareness is triggered. Conservative practice requires starting the clock from the earliest moment you have facts implicating a third party, whether through document review, deposition testimony, or expert analysis.
SUBDIVISION (C)

Employer exception

Before
Nothing in this section shall limit the right of a defendant to implead an employer of an injured party pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law section eleven.
After
A third-party complaint against an employer pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law section eleven, where the basis for the claim is a grave injury or the identity of the employer was not known at the time the defendant served its answer, shall be filed within one hundred twenty days after the later of: (i) the date on which the grave injury status of the injured party became known to the defendant, or (ii) the date on which the identity of the employer first became known to the defendant.
What this means
The employer exception preserves access to the WCL § 11 grave injury claim, which is critical in Labor Law construction cases. The 120-day window is measured from whichever triggering event occurs later: learning of the grave injury, or learning the employer's identity. Because both facts are often confirmed through investigation and medical records, this provision requires active case monitoring from the date of service.
SUBDIVISION (D)

Post-note-of-issue prohibition

No third-party complaint shall be filed after the filing of the note of issue. Any such complaint filed in violation of this subdivision shall be dismissed or severed without prejudice.
What this means
This is a hard stop. Once the note of issue is on file, impleader is categorically prohibited regardless of whether any other deadline has run. The "without prejudice" language means the claim is not permanently barred, but in practice, relitigating it in a separate action is costly and uncertain.
SUBDIVISION (E)

Extensions

The time to file a third-party complaint may be extended by written agreement of all parties for a period not to exceed thirty days beyond the applicable deadline. Any further extension shall require leave of court upon a showing of good cause and that the extension is in the interest of justice. In no event may a third-party complaint be filed more than twelve months after service of the answer without the written consent of the plaintiff and leave of court.
What this means
The extension framework creates a three-tier system: (1) the base deadline, (2) a 30-day written extension by party agreement, and (3) a court-ordered extension for good cause. The 12-month hard cap is absolute short of plaintiff consent and court approval. Note that the 30-day extension does not reset the 12-month hard cap.
SUBDIVISION (F)

Consolidation ban

A third-party action that has been severed from the main action pursuant to this section or pursuant to CPLR section 603 may not thereafter be consolidated with the main action.
What this means
Once severed, always severed. This provision closes a potential loophole by which a defendant might delay filing, accept severance, and then seek reconsolidation to avoid the practical impact of the deadline. The consolidation ban is permanent and unconditional.

Stay informed

Get notified when courts issue AVOID Act rulings

The annotated text is a living document. Updates go to subscribers first.

By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from TheAvoidAct.com. Unsubscribe any time.